William G. Witt

October 3, 2026

The Oxford Movement

Filed under: Anglicanism,History,Sacraments,Theology — William Witt @ 3:02 pm
Edward B. Pusey

The previous essay discussed the Evangelical Revival in the Church of England, associated on the one hand with the movement of John and Charles Wesley that led to the eventual formation of Methodism as a church body separate from the Church of England, and on the other with those like John Newton, William Wilberforce, and Charles Simeon associated with the Clapham Sect, who, while staying within the Church of England, shared with Methodism the characteristic of being a kind of ecclesiola in ecclesia, a reforming movement within the Church of England.

The Oxford Movement of the following generation lasted through the short period of 1833 to 1845. Despite existing for only a decade, the movement created the Anglo-Catholic wing of the Church of England, and, in its own way, had as much influence on later Anglicanism as did the Evangelical Revival. Similarly to the earlier movement, it became a movement within the larger church (an ecclesiola in ecclesia), and, like the Evangelical Revival, was not only a movement of reform, but a criticism of perceived failings within the larger church.

The historical setting of this intended corrective included what could be designated the “worldly church.” At the beginning of the nineteenth century, there was a great deal of wealth inequality in the hierarchy of the Church of England, particularly between wealthy bishops and local clergy, who were often poor. Receiving the office of episcopacy was often a case of having the right social connections and being born into the right family. A bishop could have a very comfortable lifestyle if he happened to be the right bishop in the right location at the right time. On the other hand, a parish priest in an ordinary small country parish might be quite poor.

Connected with this disparity was the problem of absenteeism. If a priest was wealthy enough, he could receive the income from a particular parish and use it to pay someone else to do the actual pastoral work without ever being personally present. The novels of Jane Austen and Anthony Trollope provide examples of clerical politics and the concern of some clergy to become wealthy by having the right patron. Mr. Collins in Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice is one of the more comical examples in English literature of such a priest.

Also important as cultural background was the Romantic Movement, largely a reaction against the Enlightenment of the previous century. Romanticism had its effect in the music of Beethoven, the literature of Goethe, and the poetry of Keats and Shelley. The Romantic Movement was also associated with an idealization of the Middle Ages, for example, in such novels as Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott.

In architecture, Romanticism was associated with the Gothic Revival. Beginning in the nineteenth century, architects began once again to build churches that looked like the churches of the Middle Ages. Modern people often think of these Gothic revival churches when they imagine what an Anglican church looks like. Even in small town USA, one can find Presbyterian, Methodist, and even Baptist churches in the Gothic style.

Politically, the Napoleonic Wars lasted from 1803 to 1815, and came to an end when Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo. In England, Parliament passed several laws that resulted in the protests that marked the first stages of the Oxford Movement. The Sacramental Test Act of 1828 repealed the requirement that members of Parliament had to take communion in the Church of England. In 1829, the Roman Catholic Relief Act for the first time allowed Roman Catholics to become members of Parliament. In 1832, the Reform Act was an alliance of Whigs and Dissenters, which strengthened the House of Commons, thus reducing the power of the House of Lords, which included bishops of the Church of England who served in the House of Lords.

These three laws had the following effects. First, they gave more power to the middle class in England, many of whom were Dissenters and Roman Catholics.

Second, non-Anglicans were now members of Parliament. Since the Church of England was a state church, this meant that non-Anglicans could make decisions that affected the established church. In 1832, Parliament passed the Irish Church Measure, the practical purpose of which was to reduce the number of bishops in the Church of Ireland, which was a branch of the Church of England, but was also a minority church, since the Roman Catholic church was the church of most of the Irish people. Parliament’s goal was to save money by reducing the number of bishops from twenty-two to twelve.

The Tractarians

The Oxford Movement began when John Keble preached his famous Assize Sermon on National Apostasy on July 14, 1833. Keble believed that Parliament had overstepped its bounds. A secular Parliament including Roman Catholics and Dissenters who were not members of the Church of England had no business telling the Church of England, or the Church of Ireland in this case, how many bishops it could have.

After the sermon, Keble and some of his friends began publishing a series of essays titled Tracts for the Times.1 Because of these Tracts, members of the Oxford Movement were referred to at the time as “Tractarians.” In 1836, the group began publishing a series of translations of patristic texts titled the Library of the Fathers. Some of these translations are still the only available English translations of some of these texts. The Tractarian Movement came to an end in 1841 with the publication of Tract 90 by John Henry Newman. (more…)

April 9, 2026

John Jewel and the Catholicity of Anglicanism

Filed under: Anglicanism,Development of Doctrine,History,Sacraments,Theology — William Witt @ 1:40 pm

Dates (1522-1572)

1522 Born at Buden, Devonshire
1535 Enters Merton College, Oxford
1539 Transfers to Corpus Christi, Oxford
1540 Receives Bachelor of Arts
1545 Receives Master’s Degree
1548 Elected as Reader of Humanity and Rhetoric
1551 Receives license to preach at Sunningwell
1552 Accession of Mary Tudor; Jewel deprived of his fellowship at Corpus Christi
1554 Jewel signs articles agreeing with Roman Doctrine
1555 Jewel flees to Frankfurt, Strasbourg and later Zurich (with a letter from Cranmer); is deeply affected by disagreements among English exiles at Frankfurt
1558 Death of Mary and accession of Elizabeth; Jewel returns to England
1559 Jewel participates in disputation at Oxford against Roman clergy; Paul’s Cross “Challenge Sermon”

“If any learned man of all our adversaries . . . be able to bring any one sufficient sentence out of any old catholic doctor, or father, or out of any old general council or out of the holy scriptures of God, or any one example of the primitive church, whereby it may be clearly and plainly proved . . .”

1560 Consecrated Bishop of Salisbury
1562 Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae (Apology of the Church of England)
1565 Reply to Harding
1566 Defense of the Apology

“What mystical catholic ears M. Harding hath, that cannot abide the phrases and speeches of the ancient fathers.”

1570 Paul’s Cross Sermon against the Puritans (not published)

John Jewel

John Jewel (1522-1571) was a second-generation Anglican Reformer. He was a protege of Thomas Cranmer, and thus knew Cranmer personally. Later the great Anglican Divine Richard Hooker was a protege of Jewel’s. There is then something like a three-generation passing of the torch from Cranmer to Jewel to Hooker.

For a number of reasons, Jewel is unfortunately less well known than either Cranmer or Hooker. Cranmer is best known for his role in the creation of the Book of Common Prayer, which has provided the structure for Anglican worship for four hundred years. Richard Hooker is known for his writing of The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, which is probably the closest thing that Anglicans have to a systematic theology at the time of the Reformation. While his contribution is less, Jewel is nonetheless a significant figure, particularly for the development of Anglican ecclesiology – how Anglicans understand what it means to be a church, and, in that regard, how they address the question of the relationship between Anglicanism (or the Church of England) and the pre-Reformation western Catholic church.

In apologetic discussions, many Protestants and Roman Catholics agree in viewing the relationship between the medieval Catholic church and the post-Reformation Protestant churches as a simple break. This can be seen in such questions as “Did Henry VIII found the Church of England?” or “Where was your church before the Reformation?” or “Did the Church of England break with the Catholic church in order for Henry VIII to get a divorce?” Jewel’s approach to ecclesiology rejects this dichotomy. He refused to understand the Reformation as a simple break with the Roman Catholic church or to interpret the Reformation as a new beginning that leapt over sixteen hundred years of history to go straight back to Scripture, forgetting everything that had happened between the time of the death of the last apostle and Martin Luther’s 95 Theses.

At the heart of Jewel’s argument is the claim that Anglicanism was not the beginning of a new church; rather, the English Reformation was indeed a reformation, the reforming of the late medieval western Catholic church that Jewel claimed had in many ways departed from the historic church of the Patristic era and of the church of the New Testament Apostles before that. (more…)

July 12, 2023

I Get Mail: Christianity and History

Filed under: History,Theology — William Witt @ 2:07 am

MosesOccasionally, I get mail. The following are a couple of questions sent to me on behalf of someone asking about the historical reliability of Scripture. I am a systematic theologian, and not primarily a biblical scholar or a historian, and people trained in these areas could no doubt address these issues with more sophistication. At the same time, one of the things that theologians do is to try to address the questions that ordinary people ask, and this notion that the Bible is historically unreliable, closer to “fairy tales” than history, seems to be common in contemporary secular culture these days.

I am not a biblical scholar myself, but I read people who are, and, at the least, I can pull together what others who are more competent than myself have said about this topic. Perhaps ordinary lay people will find this helpful. The footnotes and bibliography will provide some guidance for further exploration.

If the Bible contains some truths and some stories, how do you determine which is which and who is the arbitrator of that “truth”? What is the evidence? I understand from a religious standpoint, this is a very dangerous and slippery slope that you may not want to explore, but I believe there are significantly more stories and embellishments in the Bible that render it essentially more philosophical or historically unreliable rather than factual.

Can Christianity exist if Judaism is proven false? In my mind, it seems I have a near-logical proof (at least to a degree of reasonableness) developing that indicates that the basis for Judaism is not valid (not dissimilar to the origin of Mormonism). If true, what are the implications?

History or “Story”?

The question needs to be more carefully put.

As stated, the question seems to equate “truth” with “factual” or “philosophical,” and “stories” with “historically unreliable.”

The real concern seems to be about the historical reliability of the Biblical narratives specifically as historical accounts. To address that question, it is necessary to provide some preliminary clarification. “Narrative” is probably a better word in this regard than “stories” because “stories” (as used here) seems to be equated with non-factual fiction. However, it is even misleading to equate “fiction” with “untrue.” Fiction can be “unhistorical,” and yet, in its own way, address issues of “truth.” For example, Aesop’s Fables are fictional accounts that communicate moral truths.

Narrative covers several possible categories.

(more…)

Non Sermoni Res — William G. Witt is proudly powered by WordPress