<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Development of Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/theology/on-the-development-of-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/on-the-development-of-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Summary Reminder on Newman &#171; Reformation500</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/on-the-development-of-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>A Summary Reminder on Newman &#171; Reformation500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=121#comment-715</guid>
		<description>[...] Witt, an Anglican, wrote a bit about Newman and development, and here he defines here identifies two different kinds of development. He cites Mozley, who accuses Newman of using the same word (&#8220;development&#8221;) to mean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Witt, an Anglican, wrote a bit about Newman and development, and here he defines here identifies two different kinds of development. He cites Mozley, who accuses Newman of using the same word (&#8220;development&#8221;) to mean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non Sermoni Res</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/on-the-development-of-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Non Sermoni Res</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=121#comment-708</guid>
		<description>[...] and, particularly on John Henry Newman&#8217;s own contribution. (For previous discussion, see here, here, here, here, and here. In what follows I intend to focus on Newman&#8217;s shorter essay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and, particularly on John Henry Newman&#8217;s own contribution. (For previous discussion, see here, here, here, here, and here. In what follows I intend to focus on Newman&#8217;s shorter essay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

