<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas Aquinas on Creation (or How to Read Thomas Aquinas):Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/how-to-read-thomas-aquinas-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:39:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seretha</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/how-to-read-thomas-aquinas-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Seretha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?page_id=176#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t his doctrine of participation moderate the radical &quot;otherness&quot; of the Creator from the creature?  If the creature only exists because it shares in God&#039;s existence there is a link between the two.  But the creature depends on the Creature and the Creator does not depend on the creature and thus God&#039;s independence is preserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t his doctrine of participation moderate the radical &#8220;otherness&#8221; of the Creator from the creature?  If the creature only exists because it shares in God&#8217;s existence there is a link between the two.  But the creature depends on the Creature and the Creator does not depend on the creature and thus God&#8217;s independence is preserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
