<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non Sermoni Res &#187; Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/category/theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some Brief Reflections on Inclusive Language</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first encountered the problem of &#8220;inclusive language&#8221; when I was working on my doctorate quite awhile ago.  The University of Notre Dame Theology Department had a policy that all written work had to use &#8220;inclusive language.&#8221;  At least one of the faculty members interpreted this to mean that one could not use male language [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article on The Hermeneutics of Same-Sex Practice</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Episcopal Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is only within the last generation that affluent Western Christians have suggested that same-sex sexual activity might be morally permissible. The unanimous consensus of the previous Christian tradition (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and Anglican) has been that homosexual activity is immoral, condemned by both Scripture and Church tradition. The vast majority of critical biblical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I get mail . . .</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The North American Anglican Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the following today, which succinctly summarizes questions I have been asked numerous times in recent years: Dear Sir, Just curious about how you can be a part of ACNA which endorses and embraces innovations to doctrine and discipline that seem to make the Assumption and IC rather more forgivable- i.e. ordination of women, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article on Justification by Faith</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecumenism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I regularly teach a course entitled The Anglican Way of Theology at an “Evangelical seminary in the Anglican tradition.” We begin the course with the English Reformation, and I am repeatedly surprised when I discover every year as I grade student papers that the Reformation doctrine of “justification by grace alone through faith alone” is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question About Infant Baptism</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the following email: Dr. Witt, I&#8217;ve greatly appreciated many of your posts (your series on the development of doctrine was particularly helpful for understanding what Newman was trying to accomplish and the underlying assumptions of modern Roman Catholic apologists when they try to use it on unsuspecting evangelicals). I also found your summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on Predestination</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We begin with the Scholastic Distinction Between Ordo Cognoscendi (Order of Knowing) and the Ordo Essendi (Order of Being): The order in which we come to know things is the opposite of the order in which they exist. Applied to theology: The basic principle of theology is that God is in se who he is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Humility of Divine Presence: A Sermon</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exodus 17: 1-7 Psalm 78 Philippians 2:1-13 Matthew 21:23-32 Among other things, the Bible is a book of questions. The very first question in the Bible is the question the serpent asks of Eve, “Did God actually say, You shall not eat of any fruit of the garden?” (Gen. 3:1) And the first question God [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caller ID From the Source of the Universe: Another Providence Sermon</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonah 2:1-9 Psalm 29 Romans 9:1-5 Matthew 14:22-33 Recently I have been reading some books written by folks like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens who have been labelled the “New Atheists,” and I am going to let you in on a secret. The secret is that these books are not about what you might think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical or Catholic? A Bibliography</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecumenism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank all those who read my post on “Evangelical or Catholic?” In a month, this has received over 1,100 hits, more than any single blog post I have written. I am usually happy if what I write gets 100 reads. Clearly there is sympathy (or at least interest) in getting beyond the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anglican Reformers Were Not Zwinglians! Addendum</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I did not make the connection at the time, I later realized that the &#8220;former Anglo-Catholic&#8221; advocating the Zwinglian reading of the Anglican Reformers is Gary W. Jenkins, author of John Jewel And The English National Church: The Dilemmas Of An Erastian Reformer (Ashgate Publishing, 2006). The blurb at Amazon describes the book as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

