<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non Sermoni Res &#187; Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/category/theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Article on Justification by Faith</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecumenism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I regularly teach a course entitled The Anglican Way of Theology at an “Evangelical seminary in the Anglican tradition.” We begin the course with the English Reformation, and I am repeatedly surprised when I discover every year as I grade student papers that the Reformation doctrine of “justification by grace alone through faith alone” is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/new-article-on-justification-by-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question About Infant Baptism</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the following email: Dr. Witt, I&#8217;ve greatly appreciated many of your posts (your series on the development of doctrine was particularly helpful for understanding what Newman was trying to accomplish and the underlying assumptions of modern Roman Catholic apologists when they try to use it on unsuspecting evangelicals). I also found your summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/a-question-about-infant-baptism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on Predestination</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We begin with the Scholastic Distinction Between Ordo Cognoscendi (Order of Knowing) and the Ordo Essendi (Order of Being): The order in which we come to know things is the opposite of the order in which they exist. Applied to theology: The basic principle of theology is that God is in se who he is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/notes-on-predestination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Humility of Divine Presence: A Sermon</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exodus 17: 1-7 Psalm 78 Philippians 2:1-13 Matthew 21:23-32 Among other things, the Bible is a book of questions. The very first question in the Bible is the question the serpent asks of Eve, “Did God actually say, You shall not eat of any fruit of the garden?” (Gen. 3:1) And the first question God [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/the-humility-of-divine-presence-a-sermon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caller ID From the Source of the Universe: Another Providence Sermon</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonah 2:1-9 Psalm 29 Romans 9:1-5 Matthew 14:22-33 Recently I have been reading some books written by folks like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens who have been labelled the “New Atheists,” and I am going to let you in on a secret. The secret is that these books are not about what you might think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/caller-id-from-the-source-of-the-universe-another-providence-sermon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical or Catholic? A Bibliography</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecumenism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank all those who read my post on “Evangelical or Catholic?” In a month, this has received over 1,100 hits, more than any single blog post I have written. I am usually happy if what I write gets 100 reads. Clearly there is sympathy (or at least interest) in getting beyond the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anglican Reformers Were Not Zwinglians! Addendum</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I did not make the connection at the time, I later realized that the &#8220;former Anglo-Catholic&#8221; advocating the Zwinglian reading of the Anglican Reformers is Gary W. Jenkins, author of John Jewel And The English National Church: The Dilemmas Of An Erastian Reformer (Ashgate Publishing, 2006). The blurb at Amazon describes the book as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anglican Reformers Were Not Zwinglians!</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I am certain it is a mere coincidence, at Titus19, Kendall Harmon has linked to a blog post by a former Calvinist and former Anglo-Catholic, now (apparently) Roman Catholic, who advocates exactly the kind of old school &#8220;clear break&#8221; version of Reformation histoiography I had mentioned in my recent post in which I argued [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical or Catholic?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determinism?  It&#8217;s a heresy, why?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/theology/determinism-its-a-heresy-why/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/theology/determinism-its-a-heresy-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I must be in a cranky mood today. At any rate, the following is also something I originally put on a certain (NeoCalvinist) Anglican(?) blog in response to the following: The man born blind in John 9 was not an accident of biology. He was born blind so that the Lord Jesus could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/theology/determinism-its-a-heresy-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

