<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non Sermoni Res &#187; Scripture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/category/scripture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some Brief Reflections on Inclusive Language</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first encountered the problem of &#8220;inclusive language&#8221; when I was working on my doctorate quite awhile ago.  The University of Notre Dame Theology Department had a policy that all written work had to use &#8220;inclusive language.&#8221;  At least one of the faculty members interpreted this to mean that one could not use male language [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/some-brief-reflections-on-inclusive-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article on The Hermeneutics of Same-Sex Practice</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Episcopal Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is only within the last generation that affluent Western Christians have suggested that same-sex sexual activity might be morally permissible. The unanimous consensus of the previous Christian tradition (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and Anglican) has been that homosexual activity is immoral, condemned by both Scripture and Church tradition. The vast majority of critical biblical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/new-article-on-the-hermeneutics-of-same-sex-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Readings: A Sermon</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/second-readings/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/second-readings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feast Day of St. John the Baptist Isaiah 40: 1-11 Acts 13:14b-26 Luke 1:57-80 In what follows, I am going to depart from the usual way in which responsible expository preachers are supposed to preach sermons. I am not going to focus primarily on the meaning of the biblical texts themselves. Rather, I am going [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/second-readings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Aquinas on the Formal Sufficiency of Scripture</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/thomas-aquinas-on-the-formal-sufficiency-of-scripture/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/thomas-aquinas-on-the-formal-sufficiency-of-scripture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development of Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Michael Liccione has responded to my post on the distinction between formal and informal sufficiency of Scripture, and specifically objects to my reading that Thomas Aquinas subscribes to a &#8220;formal sufficiency&#8221; of Scripture. By a formal sufficiency I had meant that Scripture has an inherent intelligibility that does not derive from some source outside [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/thomas-aquinas-on-the-formal-sufficiency-of-scripture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrestling With the Symbols: A Sermon on Reading Scripture</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/wrestling-with-the-symbols-a-sermon-on-reading-scripture/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/wrestling-with-the-symbols-a-sermon-on-reading-scripture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a sermon that appeared on my website, and never made it to my blog. Sometimes an example is better than an argument. Perhaps what I write below shows something of what I mean when I say that Scripture is &#8220;formally sufficient&#8221; and has an &#8220;inherent intelligibility.&#8221; Other helpful examples can be found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/sermons/wrestling-with-the-symbols-a-sermon-on-reading-scripture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Reply to the Questioning Christian</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/a-reply-to-the-questioning-christian/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/a-reply-to-the-questioning-christian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[D.C. Toedt (aka The Questioning Christian) is one of the regular contrarians who hangs out at TitusOneNine, Kendall Harmon&#8217;s blog. D.C is a lawyer who regularly raises doubts about the historical reliability of the New Testament&#8211;especially when it comes to either miracles or the historic doctrines of the church. In a recent discussion over at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/scripture/a-reply-to-the-questioning-christian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

