<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non Sermoni Res &#187; Anglicanism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/category/anglicanism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Whatever It Is, I&#8217;m (Not Necessarily) Against It!</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The North American Anglican Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to be a regular participant at the two most frequented “conservative” Episcopal/Anglican blogs.  I refuse to comment at one at all any more, and do no more than make the occasional comment at the other.
Why?  While I consider myself an orthodox Anglican, I do not in any sense of the word [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newman&#8217;s Incoherence</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous blog post in which I listed a number of theological principles I hoped someday to discuss further, I had written the following:
On the question of doctrinal development, the fundamental choice is between Newman’s and Barth’s understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity. The issue of continuity between (1) God’s revelation in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Leave? A Followup</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave-a-followup/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave-a-followup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Why Not Leave?&#8221; was one of the first blog posts I did, and the most popular.  It received over 14,000 views.  A lot of the people who viewed it at the time misread it as an apology to stay in the Episcopal Church, but that was a misreading.  If you read to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave-a-followup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it Necessary to be in Communion With Canterbury in Order to be Anglican?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/is-it-necessary-to-be-in-communion-with-canterbury-in-order-to-be-anglican/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/is-it-necessary-to-be-in-communion-with-canterbury-in-order-to-be-anglican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One could read any number of classical works that talk about what it means to be Anglican and find virtually no references to the &#34;See of Canterbury.&#34; For example, I&#8217;m not sure that the word &#34;Canterbury&#34; appears once in John Jewell&#8217;s Apology of the Church of England. If one reads those who articulated the historic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/is-it-necessary-to-be-in-communion-with-canterbury-in-order-to-be-anglican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Not Leave?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in awhile, a commenter on one of the orthodox Anglican blogs will raise the question: “Why not just leave?”  Sometimes they’re asking, “Why not leave the Episcopal Church?”  Often these are ECUSA revisionists who are irritated because they&#8217;ve won the battle, or at least they thought they had, yet we&#8217;re not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/why-not-leave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
