<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non Sermoni Res &#187; Anglicanism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willgwitt.org/category/anglicanism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willgwitt.org</link>
	<description>Musings About Theology, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Icons of Christ: A Sermon Preached at the Ordination of David Booman to the Priesthood</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/icons-of-christ-an-ordination-sermon/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/icons-of-christ-an-ordination-sermon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sermons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isa. 6:1-8 Psalm 119:33-40 Phil. 4:4-9 John 10:1-16 David, I want to thank you for asking me to preach at your ordination. I am a layperson, which means that I am a sheep, not a shepherd. It is a great honor for a sheep to address someone who is on the verge of becoming a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/icons-of-christ-an-ordination-sermon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I get mail . . .</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The North American Anglican Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received the following today, which succinctly summarizes questions I have been asked numerous times in recent years: Dear Sir, Just curious about how you can be a part of ACNA which endorses and embraces innovations to doctrine and discipline that seem to make the Assumption and IC rather more forgivable- i.e. ordination of women, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/i-get-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical or Catholic? A Bibliography</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecumenism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank all those who read my post on “Evangelical or Catholic?” In a month, this has received over 1,100 hits, more than any single blog post I have written. I am usually happy if what I write gets 100 reads. Clearly there is sympathy (or at least interest) in getting beyond the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic-bibliography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anglican Reformers Were Not Zwinglians! Addendum</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I did not make the connection at the time, I later realized that the &#8220;former Anglo-Catholic&#8221; advocating the Zwinglian reading of the Anglican Reformers is Gary W. Jenkins, author of John Jewel And The English National Church: The Dilemmas Of An Erastian Reformer (Ashgate Publishing, 2006). The blurb at Amazon describes the book as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-addendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anglican Reformers Were Not Zwinglians!</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I am certain it is a mere coincidence, at Titus19, Kendall Harmon has linked to a blog post by a former Calvinist and former Anglo-Catholic, now (apparently) Roman Catholic, who advocates exactly the kind of old school &#8220;clear break&#8221; version of Reformation histoiography I had mentioned in my recent post in which I argued [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/the-anglican-reformers-were-not-zwinglians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical or Catholic?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/evangelical-or-catholic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How NOT to Attract Young People</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/how-not-to-attract-young-people/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/how-not-to-attract-young-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Episcopal Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinity School for Ministry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at StandFirm, they linked to this article from the Episcopal Diocese of Arizona about “How to Get More Young People in Church.” This is the liberal TEC diocese that I found so attractive that for the six months I lived in Arizona about five years ago, I worshiped in a Lutheran church. (But, of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/how-not-to-attract-young-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hooker was a Calvinist . . . Right?</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/hooker-was-a-calvinist-right/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/hooker-was-a-calvinist-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a certain Neo-Calvinist, but (ostensibly) Anglican blog, someone recently posted the following: At least one scholar to my knowledge has pointed out that Richard Hooker was more Calvinist than the Puritans Say Whattt???!!! My response: To have actually read Hooker is to know otherwise. Hooker’s position could be desccribed as Reformed Catholic. With the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/hooker-was-a-calvinist-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever It Is, I&#8217;m (Not Necessarily) Against It!</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The North American Anglican Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to be a regular participant at the two most frequented “conservative” Episcopal/Anglican blogs. I refuse to comment at one at all any more, and do no more than make the occasional comment at the other. Why? While I consider myself an orthodox Anglican, I do not in any sense of the word consider [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/whatever-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newman&#8217;s Incoherence</title>
		<link>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/</link>
		<comments>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Witt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willgwitt.org/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous blog post in which I listed a number of theological principles I hoped someday to discuss further, I had written the following: On the question of doctrinal development, the fundamental choice is between Newman’s and Barth’s understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity. The issue of continuity between (1) God’s revelation in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://willgwitt.org/anglicanism/newmans-incoherence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

